All leagues
Jupiler Pro League
Belgium
56.3
% League imbalance
2.84
Goals per match
0.11
Non-penalty xG per shot
25.4
Average age
14.7
% minutes played by U21

Expected Goals (xG)

2 KRC Genk 76.82
3 Union Saint-Gilloise 75.18
4 KAA Gent 69.56
5 RSC Anderlecht 64.61
6 Cercle Brugge 63.92
7 Royal Antwerp 58.06
8 Mechelen 58.05
9 Sint-Truidense VV 52.90
10 KVC Westerlo 51.24
11 Standard Liège 44.38
12 RWDM 43.21
13 Oud-Heverlee Leuven 42.81
14 Sporting de Charleroi 40.89
15 KAS Eupen 33.73
16 KV Kortrijk 32.80

Expected Goals (xG)

2 KRC Genk 76.82
3 Union Saint-Gilloise 75.18
4 KAA Gent 69.56
5 RSC Anderlecht 64.61
6 Cercle Brugge 63.92
7 Royal Antwerp 58.06
8 Mechelen 58.05
9 Sint-Truidense VV 52.90
10 KVC Westerlo 51.24
11 Standard Liège 44.38
12 RWDM 43.21
13 Oud-Heverlee Leuven 42.81
14 Sporting de Charleroi 40.89
15 KAS Eupen 33.73
16 KV Kortrijk 32.80

Shot accuracy (%)

RWDM
40.1
2 RSC Anderlecht 39.7
3 KAA Gent 39.0
4 Union Saint-Gilloise 38.6
5 Mechelen 37.5

Shot accuracy (%)

RWDM
40.1
2 RSC Anderlecht 39.7
3 KAA Gent 39.0
4 Union Saint-Gilloise 38.6
5 Mechelen 37.5

Goal Conversion (%)

2 Club Brugge 13.63
3 KAA Gent 13.25
4 Union Saint-Gilloise 12.46
5 Royal Antwerp 11.74

Goal Conversion (%)

2 Club Brugge 13.63
3 KAA Gent 13.25
4 Union Saint-Gilloise 12.46
5 Royal Antwerp 11.74

On-Target Shots Conceded

2 Club Brugge 134
3 KRC Genk 145
4 Royal Antwerp 145
5 KAA Gent 162

On-Target Shots Conceded

2 Club Brugge 134
3 KRC Genk 145
4 Royal Antwerp 145
5 KAA Gent 162

Save ratio (%)

2 Club Brugge 74.22
3 Cercle Brugge 73.96
4 Royal Antwerp 70.92
5 Mechelen 70.55

Save ratio (%)

2 Club Brugge 74.22
3 Cercle Brugge 73.96
4 Royal Antwerp 70.92
5 Mechelen 70.55

Build-up Disruption % (BDP)

2 KRC Genk Subscription needed
3 KAA Gent Subscription needed
4 Union Saint-Gilloise Subscription needed
5 Royal Antwerp Subscription needed

Build-up Disruption % (BDP)

2 KRC Genk Subscription needed
3 KAA Gent Subscription needed
4 Union Saint-Gilloise Subscription needed
5 Royal Antwerp Subscription needed

Gegenpressing Int % (GPI)

2 Union Saint-Gilloise Subscription needed
3 KRC Genk Subscription needed
4 RSC Anderlecht Subscription needed
5 Club Brugge Subscription needed

Gegenpressing Int % (GPI)

2 Union Saint-Gilloise Subscription needed
3 KRC Genk Subscription needed
4 RSC Anderlecht Subscription needed
5 Club Brugge Subscription needed

Field Tilt (%)

2 Cercle Brugge Subscription needed
3 Club Brugge Subscription needed
4 KRC Genk Subscription needed
5 Union Saint-Gilloise Subscription needed

Field Tilt (%)

2 Cercle Brugge Subscription needed
3 Club Brugge Subscription needed
4 KRC Genk Subscription needed
5 Union Saint-Gilloise Subscription needed

Touches in Opp. Box

2 Cercle Brugge 1136
3 KAA Gent 1132
4 KRC Genk 1130
5 Union Saint-Gilloise 1113

Touches in Opp. Box

2 Cercle Brugge 1136
3 KAA Gent 1132
4 KRC Genk 1130
5 Union Saint-Gilloise 1113

Possession %

2 Sint-Truidense VV 58.00
3 Club Brugge 56.00
4 KAA Gent 54.00
5 KRC Genk 54.00

Possession %

2 Sint-Truidense VV 58.00
3 Club Brugge 56.00
4 KAA Gent 54.00
5 KRC Genk 54.00

Successful crosses

2 KAA Gent 116
3 Mechelen 116
4 Standard Liège 111
5 KRC Genk 108

Successful crosses

2 KAA Gent 116
3 Mechelen 116
4 Standard Liège 111
5 KRC Genk 108

PPDA

2 KRC Genk Subscription needed
3 Union Saint-Gilloise Subscription needed
4 KAA Gent Subscription needed
5 Royal Antwerp Subscription needed

PPDA

2 KRC Genk Subscription needed
3 Union Saint-Gilloise Subscription needed
4 KAA Gent Subscription needed
5 Royal Antwerp Subscription needed
All leagues
Jupiler Pro League
Belgium
56.3
% League imbalance
2.84
Goals per match
0.11
Non-penalty xG per shot
25.4
Average age
14.7
% Minutes played by U21

Expected Goals (xG)

2 KRC Genk 76.82
3 Union Saint-Gilloise 75.18
4 KAA Gent 69.56
5 RSC Anderlecht 64.61
6 Cercle Brugge 63.92
7 Royal Antwerp 58.06
8 Mechelen 58.05
9 Sint-Truidense VV 52.90
10 KVC Westerlo 51.24
11 Standard Liège 44.38
12 RWDM 43.21
13 Oud-Heverlee Leuven 42.81
14 Sporting de Charleroi 40.89
15 KAS Eupen 33.73
16 KV Kortrijk 32.80

Expected Goals (xG)

2 KRC Genk 76.82
3 Union Saint-Gilloise 75.18
4 KAA Gent 69.56
5 RSC Anderlecht 64.61
6 Cercle Brugge 63.92
7 Royal Antwerp 58.06
8 Mechelen 58.05
9 Sint-Truidense VV 52.90
10 KVC Westerlo 51.24
11 Standard Liège 44.38
12 RWDM 43.21
13 Oud-Heverlee Leuven 42.81
14 Sporting de Charleroi 40.89
15 KAS Eupen 33.73
16 KV Kortrijk 32.80

Shot accuracy (%)

RWDM
40.1
2 RSC Anderlecht 39.7
3 KAA Gent 39.0
4 Union Saint-Gilloise 38.6
5 Mechelen 37.5

Shot accuracy (%)

RWDM
40.1
2 RSC Anderlecht 39.7
3 KAA Gent 39.0
4 Union Saint-Gilloise 38.6
5 Mechelen 37.5

Goal Conversion (%)

2 Club Brugge 13.63
3 KAA Gent 13.25
4 Union Saint-Gilloise 12.46
5 Royal Antwerp 11.74

Goal Conversion (%)

2 Club Brugge 13.63
3 KAA Gent 13.25
4 Union Saint-Gilloise 12.46
5 Royal Antwerp 11.74

On-Target Shots Conceded

2 Club Brugge 134
3 KRC Genk 145
4 Royal Antwerp 145
5 KAA Gent 162

On-Target Shots Conceded

2 Club Brugge 134
3 KRC Genk 145
4 Royal Antwerp 145
5 KAA Gent 162

Save ratio (%)

2 Club Brugge 74.22
3 Cercle Brugge 73.96
4 Royal Antwerp 70.92
5 Mechelen 70.55

Save ratio (%)

2 Club Brugge 74.22
3 Cercle Brugge 73.96
4 Royal Antwerp 70.92
5 Mechelen 70.55

Build-up Disruption % (BDP)

2 KRC Genk Subscription needed
3 KAA Gent Subscription needed
4 Union Saint-Gilloise Subscription needed
5 Royal Antwerp Subscription needed

Build-up Disruption % (BDP)

2 KRC Genk Subscription needed
3 KAA Gent Subscription needed
4 Union Saint-Gilloise Subscription needed
5 Royal Antwerp Subscription needed

Gegenpressing Int % (GPI)

2 Union Saint-Gilloise Subscription needed
3 KRC Genk Subscription needed
4 RSC Anderlecht Subscription needed
5 Club Brugge Subscription needed

Gegenpressing Int % (GPI)

2 Union Saint-Gilloise Subscription needed
3 KRC Genk Subscription needed
4 RSC Anderlecht Subscription needed
5 Club Brugge Subscription needed

Field Tilt (%)

2 Cercle Brugge Subscription needed
3 Club Brugge Subscription needed
4 KRC Genk Subscription needed
5 Union Saint-Gilloise Subscription needed

Field Tilt (%)

2 Cercle Brugge Subscription needed
3 Club Brugge Subscription needed
4 KRC Genk Subscription needed
5 Union Saint-Gilloise Subscription needed

Touches in Opp. Box

2 Cercle Brugge 1136
3 KAA Gent 1132
4 KRC Genk 1130
5 Union Saint-Gilloise 1113

Touches in Opp. Box

2 Cercle Brugge 1136
3 KAA Gent 1132
4 KRC Genk 1130
5 Union Saint-Gilloise 1113

Possession %

2 Sint-Truidense VV 58.00
3 Club Brugge 56.00
4 KAA Gent 54.00
5 KRC Genk 54.00

Possession %

2 Sint-Truidense VV 58.00
3 Club Brugge 56.00
4 KAA Gent 54.00
5 KRC Genk 54.00

Successful crosses

2 KAA Gent 116
3 Mechelen 116
4 Standard Liège 111
5 KRC Genk 108

Successful crosses

2 KAA Gent 116
3 Mechelen 116
4 Standard Liège 111
5 KRC Genk 108

PPDA

2 KRC Genk Subscription needed
3 Union Saint-Gilloise Subscription needed
4 KAA Gent Subscription needed
5 Royal Antwerp Subscription needed

PPDA

2 KRC Genk Subscription needed
3 Union Saint-Gilloise Subscription needed
4 KAA Gent Subscription needed
5 Royal Antwerp Subscription needed